Timesheet operations guide
Timesheet Approval Process: From Time Entry to a Locked Record
A timesheet is trustworthy only when everyone can tell what was submitted, who reviewed it and whether it changed afterwards. Here is the complete process and the controls each stage needs.
What a complete approval process must establish
A useful timesheet process does more than collect a number. It establishes which work the hours belong to, who submitted them, what period they cover, who reviewed them and whether the record can still change afterwards. If any of those answers lives only in chat or memory, the approval is incomplete.
- Each entry belongs to a project and, when useful, a task.
- The employee explicitly submits a defined date range.
- A manager reviews work inside their responsibility.
- Rejected time returns with a reason.
- Submitted and approved entries cannot silently change.
The four stages
First, people record time while the context is still fresh. Manual entry works for remembered or scheduled work; a timer works when elapsed time matters. Second, the person reviews and submits the period. Submission is a handoff, not another draft save.
Third, the manager approves valid entries or rejects questionable ones with a concrete reason. Finally, the system keeps the decision with the person and timestamp attached. That creates a record payroll, billing and the team can rely on later.
Why locking is the boundary
An approval describes a particular set of hours. If those hours can be edited after submission, the manager approved a record that no longer exists. A lock makes the handoff meaningful. Corrections should happen through an explicit rejection or reopening path, not through invisible edits.
- Do not let approvers approve their own time.
- Do not accept a rejection without guidance.
- Do not separate the approval history from the time entry.
- Do not treat a spreadsheet status cell as an audit trail.
How Taskiim implements it
Taskiim connects manual or timer-based entries to projects and tasks. A person submits a date range, which locks those entries. A manager can approve selected entries or reject them, and rejection requires a written reason. The approver and the resulting change remain visible in the append-only audit log.
That is the difference between tracking activity and operating an approval process. You can inspect the complete workflow in the public demo without creating an account.